Vol. 31, No. 2 (Summer 1994)
An Intensive Comparison Of Triangulated Irregular Networks (TINS) And
Digital Elevation Models (Dems)
By MARK P. KUMLER
Monograph 45

Introduction
Objectives
Terms And Definitions
Background
Outline
The Experiment
The Study Areas

The Source Data: USGS DLG Hypsography Files
The Models
The Test Points
Making The Estimates
Results And Analysis
Quantifying The Accuracies (The Different Error Measures)
Checking Observed Differences For Statistical Significance
The Different Sets Of Test Points
The Two DEM Models: Linear Vs Inverse-Distance
The Two OEM-Based Tins
The Best DEM Vs The Best OEM-Based Tin
The Three Contour-Based Tins
The Different Sets Of Test Points, Revisited
Return To The Three Contour-Based Tins
The DEM Vs The Contour-Based Tin
The Super-Tin Vs The DEM (The Re-Match)
A Visual Comparison
Summary Of Results
Conclusion
Directions For Future Research
Final Words

 


Copyright 1992-2006 University of Toronto Press Incorporated except where otherwise noted. For guidelines on use of material on this site see Legal Notice. Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders of material included in this site. If your article appears here without your permission, please let us know and we will remove it. Contact Anne Marie Corrigan.