Volume 41, No. 4
October 1999

Arrestation, discrimination raciale et relations intergroupes
Pierre Tremblay, Manon Tremblay et Lucie Léonard

Agression sexuelle chez les garçons: comparaison des agresseurs, des agressés et des agresseurs agressés avec les autres adolescents en difficulté
Marc LeBlanc et Cindy Lapointe

Pluralistic ignorance in a prison community
Jana Grekul

Commentary
The pitfalls of determining validity by consensus
Anthony N. Doob and Jane B. Sprott

Book Reviews
DOBASH and DOBASH: Rethinking Violence Against Women
N. Zoe Hilton

ERICKSON, RILEY, CHEUNG, and O'HARE: Harm Reduction: A New Direction for Drug Policies and Programs
Lyne Chayer

ANDREWS and BONTA: The Psychology of Criminal Conduct
David Nussbaum

Coming Events

Instructions to Authors

Index to Volume 41

Abstracts/Résumés
Only abstracts of full articles are contained in these Web pages. Research notes and commentaries are usually not summarized into abstracts. Readers who need the complete texts should contact the CCJA and subscribe to the Journal. They can also purchase single copies of back issues that are still in stock.

Arrestation, discrimination raciale et relations intergroupes
Pierre Tremblay
et
Manon Tremblay
École de criminologie,
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec

This article examines the extent to which arrest decisions in Montreal (1991 - 1993) are significantly influenced by the racial status of defendants and victims or by the racial composition of neighborhoods in which offending occurs. Findings show that arrest outcomes for violent offenders are not affected by the ethnic status of either defendants or victims. On the other hand, the severity of arrest dispositions does vary across the urban landscape; specifically, it increases as the neighborhood residential concentration of black communities increases. This mark-up in the severity of arrest dispositions, however, affects both black and white defendants. Simply assuming that a significant proportion of policemen are "biased" against black defendants does not account for the fact that arrest outcomes are exactly the same for both the minority of black and the majority of white defendants living in these mixed or heterogeneous neighborhoods. An alternative view-point could be that police officers expect or have learned to expect that personal crimes or conflicts are more likely, in such neighborhoods, to produce local disturbances.

 

Agression sexuelle chez les garçons: comparaison des agresseurs, des agressés et des agresseurs agressés avec les autres adolescents en difficulté
Marc LeBlanc
et
Cindy Lapointe
École de psychoéducation
Groupe de recherche sur les adolescents en difficulté
Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec

Les études comparatives entre les adolescents en difficulté et ceux qui sont victimes ou auteurs d'agression sexuelle sont peu nombreuses. Elles sont encore moins fréquentes quand il s'agit de comparer les agresseurs sexuels avec les victimes d'une agression sexuelle et avec ceux qui sont à la fois victimes et auteurs. Elles sont encore plus rares quant il s'agit d'étudier l'agression sexuelle révélée lors d'une entrevue avec un échantillon d'adolescents judiciarisés. Les analyses rapportées dans cet article supportent deux conclusions. Premièrement, les adolescents victimes ou auteurs d'une agression sexuelle constituent un groupe différent des adolescents protégés judiciairement et des jeunes contrevenants. Ils manifestent des déficiences nettement plus importantes à la fois au niveau de l'adaptation sociale et de l'adaptation personnelle. Deuxièmement, si l'agression sexuelle homogénéise les adolescents qui la subissent ou la commettent, il n'en demeure pas moins qu'il y a une différence de degré entre les agresseurs, les agresseurs agressés et les agressés. Ces derniers affichent les expériences de socialisation les plus déficientes et les perturbations psychologiques les plus marquées.

Pluralistic ignorance in a prison community
Jana Grekul
Department of Sociology
University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta

"Pluralistic ignorance" refers to a process whereby members of a group inaccurately perceive group opinion and are misled by vocal, visible, and assertive group leaders into believing that their own opinions are less popular and less widely shared than they actually are. The result is a "perceived group opinion" which is not representative of the actual attitudes of the group members. One hundred twenty-five inmates and ninety-two correctional staff in a Canadian maximum security prison completed a questionnaire designed to measure pluralistic ignorance. Our results suggest that pluralistic ignorance may exist among inmates and guards in this Canadian institution. Both inmates and guards misperceived group opinion, but unlike the subjects in a US study conducted in the late 1950's, in which inmates were more extreme than guards in their misperceptions, the results of this study indicate that the negative misperceptions of group opinion than do inmates. Previous findings suggest that stress and violence among inmates might be reduced by exposing the stereotypes and misperceptions that exist in the minds of inmates. If misperceptions are greater among correctional officers, our findings suggest that sharing communication with guards could set the stage for a broader discussion of misperceptions among both groups.

 


CJCCJ HOME

Editor
Editorial Board
Submission Instructions

Table of Contents
Sample Article

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES
Subscribe
Renew your subscription


BUSINESS SERVICES
Advertising
Rights & Permissions
Publishing Schedule

Indexing & Abstracting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top


Copyright 1992-2006 University of Toronto Press Incorporated except where otherwise noted. For guidelines on use of material on this site see Legal Notice. Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders of material included in this site. If your article appears here without your permission, please let us know and we will remove it. Contact Anne Marie Corrigan.