Volume 45, No. 2
April 2003

Articles

The Social Context of Police Discretion with Young Offenders: An Ecological Analysis
Jennifer L. Schulenberg

Technologies of Crime: The Cyber-Attacks on Electronic Gambling Machines
John L. McMullan and David C. Perrier

La remise en liberté sous conditions par les policiers dans des événements de violence conjugale
Sonia Gauthier

The Incarceration of Aboriginal Offenders: Trends from 1978 to 2001
Julian V. Roberts and Ronald Melchers

Do Youthful Offenders Reject Adult Punishment Norms?
Jane B. Sprott

Book Reviews / Revues de livres

Abstracts/Résumés

The Social Context of Police Discretion with Young Offenders: An Ecological Analysis
Jennifer L. Schulenberg

This paper explores the relative contributions of four ecological theories of crime - urbanization theory, social disorganization theory, opportunity theory, and the overload hypothesis - to understanding crime rates and the use of discretion by Canadian police in their decision making about youth. Data on crime rates and police charging practices in 447 communities in Canada in 1991 were regressed on indicators of the characteristics of the police force and the community, within a path analytic framework. Support was found only for social disorganization theory as an explanation of crime rates; and for both urbanization theory and social disorganization theories as explanations of the police use of discretion with youth. No support was found for opportunity theory or the overload hypothesis.

Technologies of Crime: The Cyber-Attacks on Electronic Gambling Machines
John L. McMullan and David C. Perrier

This paper examines the criminal technologies and criminal organization associated with gambling-related computer crimes that occurred in the video lottery terminal industry in the province of Nova Scotia. We emphasize the techniques of VLT crime, such as cracking protection codes, boot tracing, ghost programming and down-lining, as rationally geared to neutralizing social control. We analyze how the cyber-attacks were socially organized and we conclude by discussing the implications that our case study has for the field of computer crime.

La remise en liberté sous conditions par les policiers dans des événements de violence conjugale
Sonia Gauthier

Cet article porte sur l'utilisation, par les policiers, d'un pouvoir que leur a conféré le Code criminel canadien en 1994 : celui de remettre les suspects en liberté sous conditions en attendant leur première comparution (art. 499 [2] et 503 [2.1]). Nous avons mené une recherche portant sur 1'usage de cette pratique dans le cas de ceux soupçonnés d'un crime de violence conjugale. Des entrevues semi-dirigées ont été conduites auprès de 18 policiers (enquêteurs et lieutenants-détectives) du Service de police de la Ville de Montréal, entre les mois de mars et octobre 2000. Les enquêteurs rapportent que ce nouveau pouvoir leur a permis de libérer une proportion importante de prévenus. Toutefois, l'ampleur de cette pratique varie entre les enquêteurs, qui disent utiliser cette mesure pour 35 % à 90 % des prévenus. Cette décision est prise si l'enquêteur détermine que le prévenu ne risque pas de récidiver. Les facteurs les plus déterminants dans la décision que les enquêteurs doivent prendre sur le statut des prévenus sont la présence ou non d'antécédents de violence (judiciarisés ou non) ou de bris d'ordonnance ainsi que la gravité de l'accusation. La condition de remise en liberté qu'ils considèrent la plus importante et qu'ils imposent presque systématiquement est celle sur la non-communication avec la victime.

The Incarceration of Aboriginal Offenders: Trends from 1978 to 2001
Julian V. Roberts and Ronald Melchers

The high rates of Aboriginal admissions to custody have been noted by Commissions of Inquiry, all levels of government, and Corrections texts in Canada or some time. In the most recent year for which data are available (200-2001), Aboriginal offenders accounted for 19% of provincial admissions and 17% of federal admissions to custody. This article examines provincial custodial sentenced admissions for Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal offenders since 1978, when national statistics including the ethnicity of the offender were first published. Particular emphasis is paid in this analysis to recent trends during a period in which Parliament and the Supreme Court have tried to address the problem, the former by statutory recognition of the unique nature of Aboriginal offenders, the latter by judgements interpreting Criminal Code sentencing provisions introduced in 1996. The findings suggest that little progress has been made in reducing the number of Aboriginal sentenced admissions over the past few decades. Although the volume of Aboriginal admissions to custody has declined since 1993-1994, non-Aboriginal admissions have declined at an even faster rate, suggesting that specific policy changes are not responsible for the Aboriginal decline.

Do Youthful Offenders Reject Adult Punishment Norms?
Jane B. Sprott

This study investigates whether or not people see young offenders as a distinct group of youths who reject society's punishment norms. Specifically, views from members of the public and from young offenders on appropriate punishments in three hypothetical cases are explored. Results reveal that not only do members of the public see young offenders as a distinct group of youths who prefer more lenient punishments than do other adolescents, but young offenders themselves also believe that other young offenders would prefer lenient punishments. Young offenders, however, actually suggest harsher punishments than members of the public suggest. Moreover, young offenders are aware of public support for punitive sanctions and of the desire to keep offenders out of the community through incarceration. These findings support earlier findings by Beaquisto and Freed (1996) that offenders do not reject society's punishment norms. Young offenders' misconception that the public is punitive, however, may present a challenge for reintegration.

 

 


CJCCJ HOME

Editor
Editorial Board
Submission Instructions

Table of Contents
Sample Article

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES
Subscribe
Renew your subscription


BUSINESS SERVICES
Advertising
Rights & Permissions
Publishing Schedule

Indexing & Abstracting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top


Copyright 1992-2006 University of Toronto Press Incorporated except where otherwise noted. For guidelines on use of material on this site see Legal Notice. Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders of material included in this site. If your article appears here without your permission, please let us know and we will remove it. Contact Anne Marie Corrigan.