CJCCJ / RCCJP
July/juillet 2006 Volume 48, no. 4
Contents/Sommaire


Articles

The Freedom of Information Act as a Methodological Tool:Suing the Government for Data
Matthew G. Yeager

From Community to Intelligence: Executive Realignment of RCMP Mission
John Edward Deukmedjian

Violence and Threats against Lawyers Practising in Vancouver, Canada
Karen N. Brown and David MacAlister

Tracking High-Risk, Violent Offenders: An Examination of the National Flagging System
Annie K. Yessine and James Bonta

Research Note

The Use of Custody for Failing To Comply with a Disposition Cases
under the Young Offenders Act

Jane B. Sprott

Book Reviews / Recensions de livres
July / juillet 2006

Books Received / Livres rec us
July / juillet 2006

Coming Events / Prochains evements

 

The Freedom of Information Act as a Methodological Tool:Suing the Government for Data
Matthew G. Yeager

The U.S. Freedom of Information Act, enacted in 1966, and the corresponding
Access to Information Act in Canada, circa 1983, were designed to make
government more open and accountable to the general public. However,
neither act has functioned that way, with most requests being made by
lawyers, information professionals, corporations, and political parties.
Academic researchers, including criminal justice types, have used the act to
access a variety of information from government files. For instance, Alan
Block (1975; 1980) used old FBI files for his study of Jewish gangsters in New
York City. Ward Churchill and Jim Vander Wall (1990a; 1990b) used the act
to illustrate government law breaking in the FBI COINTELPRO program,
involving Native Americans, the Black Panthers, and other progressive
groups. Only rarely, however, have academics elected to take the government
to court and file for judicial review of the government’s disclosure decisions.
This article describes two lawsuits filed by the author, one under each act, and
illustrates both the potential of those acts for obtaining data from the
government and the pitfalls a potential plaintiff faces when prosecuting the
state for a violation of the Freedom of Information Act. The two lawsuits in
question are Yeager v. Drug Enforcement Administration (1982) and
Yeager v. Canada (Correctional Service) [2003]. This methodological
approach undoubtedly falls under more progressive theories of criminology,
such as conflict, radical, or critical perspectives, since mainstream researchers
rarely resort to this technique.


From Community to Intelligence: Executive Realignment of RCMP Mission
John Edward Deukmedjian

RCMP executive problematizations of community-policing misalignments
during the 1990s created the conditions for adopting intelligence-led policing
since late 2000. Executives identified three areas as acute problems: front-line
acceptance, training, and mid-level management. These ‘‘sites’’ of executive
problematization are expected to re-emerge under intelligence-led policing. As
such, this article proposes that new model adoptions and subsequent
organizational restructuring initiatives form part of broader cyclical
alignment. This paper also discusses the broader implications of this study in
terms of possible relocations of expertise and knowledge production at the
agency-network level.



Violence and Threats against Lawyers Practising in Vancouver, Canada
Karen N. Brown and David MacAlister

Society does not normally consider the practice of law a dangerous
occupation, but a significant number of lawyers, particularly those practising
in specialties such as criminal defence, government prosecutorial positions,
and family/divorce law are encountering violence and threats. Although past
research in the United States demonstrated that lawyers have been victimized
by objectionable behaviour and threatening communications, there are no
relevant Canadian studies on this topic. In the present study, survey data
from 1,152 lawyers in Vancouver and surrounding suburbs in British
Columbia, Canada, were examined to determine if British Columbia lawyers
are being threatened, and if so, what are the types, quantity, and locations of
such threats and/or violence. Results of this current study indicate that 59.2
percent of respondents, or 683 lawyers, reported varying degrees and numbers
of threats. This article will discuss those findings.



Tracking High-Risk, Violent Offenders: An Examination of the National Flagging System
Annie K. Yessine and James Bonta

The present study investigated the effectiveness of the Canadian National
Flagging System (NFS), a policy initiative intended to identify offenders who
are judged to be suitable candidates for a Dangerous Offender (DO) or a
Long-Term Offender (LTO) application. Analyses comparing the profiles of
256 flagged offenders and 97 known high-risk, violent offenders indicated that
the flagged offenders generally showed less serious and persistent criminality
characteristics than the known high-risk, violent offenders. However, scores
on actuarial measures of risk demonstrated that both groups comprised
especially high-risk offenders. Furthermore, the violent and/or sexual
reconviction rates of the flagged offenders were significantly higher than those
reported among the typical Canadian male federal offender population. Judged
against our expectations, the base rate of DO/LTO designations among the
violent/sexual recidivist flagged offenders was also much higher than the one
estimated among the general high-risk, violent offender population in Canada.
As a whole, the findings suggested that the NFS was successful in
appropriately identifying offenders who pose a risk to the community as well
as in subsequently responding to this threat by facilitating the use of the DO/
LTO provisions. Recommendations for the development of guidelines to assist
criminal justice professionals in screening, monitoring, and processing
high-risk, persistent offenders are made.


Research Note

The Use of Custody for Failing To Comply with a Disposition Cases
under the Young Offenders Act

Jane B. Sprott

Throughout the 1990s there were increases in bringing ‘‘failing to comply
with a disposition’’ cases into youth court and sentencing them to custody.
This study investigated how the nature of these cases affected their
sentencing. All cases in Canada that were disposed of in 2002/2003 and had
a conviction (or convictions) for ‘‘failing to comply with a disposition’’ (FTC)
were identified, and their previous convictions and sentences were gathered.
Results revealed that if the previous conviction was an administration of
justice offence, the current sentence was significantly harsher than if the
previous conviction was for any other type of offence, even serious violence.
Thus, it appears that judges see these sorts of cases – in which a youth has
violated an order of the court – as particularly serious. The implications for
the Youth Criminal Justice Act, if these sentencing patterns persist,
are discussed.

 


CJCCJ HOME

Editor
Editorial Board
Submission Instructions

Table of Contents
Sample Article

SUBSCRIBER SERVICES
Subscribe
Renew your subscription


BUSINESS SERVICES
Advertising
Rights & Permissions
Publishing Schedule

Indexing & Abstracting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

top


Copyright 1992-2006 University of Toronto Press Incorporated except where otherwise noted. For guidelines on use of material on this site see Legal Notice. Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders of material included in this site. If your article appears here without your permission, please let us know and we will remove it. Contact Anne Marie Corrigan.