Vol. 22 No. 4 December 1996

Articles:

Who Should Pay for University Education? Some Net Benefit Results by Funding Source for New Brunswick
Vaughan Dickson, William J. Milne, and David Murrell

This paper measures rates of return from spending on New Brunswick universities for four constituencies: the provincial government, the federal and provincial governments together, students, and society taken as a whole.

Our main finding is that the rate of return is higher for both levels of government taken together than for the provincial government alone - even before allowance is made for outmigration of university graduates. This suggests a continued role for federal government financing, since otherwise there would be an incentive for small provinces to decrease funding and import graduates from other provinces. Another finding, relevant to user pay arguments about university funding, is that the private return to students exceeds the social return, but this difference narrows considerably when costs of attending university are confined to teaching costs only.

The Bank of Canada, Accountability and Legitimacy: Some Proposals for Reform
J. Matthew Clark

Criticisms of the Bank of Canada as unaccountable, insensitive to the needs of Canadians, and beholden to the wishes of central Canada reflect a growing animosity towards the Bank that should not be ignored nor taken lightly. The failure of the Bank of Canada to receive the diffuse support of societal interests and thus to be perceived as legitimate, threatens its ability to perform credible monetary policy and even its independence. In order to ensure that the ability to perform sound monetary policy in Canada is not jeopardized, certain reforms need to be made.

Uruguay Round Impacts on Canada
Trien T. Nguyen, Carlo Perroni, and Randall M. Wigle

This paper offers an evaluation of possible effects of the Final Act of the Uruguay Round with a special focus on Canada. Our two main findings can be summarized as follows: first, the estimated impacts of the Uruguay Round are more modest than previous estimates; our second finding pertains to the liberalization in textiles and clothing which may be the most significant part of the Uruguay Round in terms of its reallocative impact in Canada.

The Impacts of Trucking Deregulation in Ontario: A Market-Specific Analysis
Clarence G. Woudsma and Pavlos S. Kanaroglou

The deregulation of transportation industries has been an ongoing part of the trend towards less government involvement in the marketplace. This paper deals with two important questions related to the impact of the reform of economic regulations in the Ontario for-hire trucking industry (Truck Transportation Act, 1989). Has there been an overall decline in shipment rates and have shipment rates involving less accessible regions increased disproportionately? The conclusions indicate that overall, there has been a decline in shipment rates in the truckload (TL) segment of the industry, although the results are inconsistent in the less-than-truckload (LTL) segment. Also, there does not appear to be a significant increase in the rates for service to less accessible regions. While deregulation has had an influence on certain specific markets examined, the scale and range of impacts have not approached those projected in the debates concerning deregulation in Ontario.

Immigrant Families in the Canadian Labour Market
Christopher Worswick

The labour market activity of immigrant and non-immigrant married couples is compared using data from the 1981 and 1991 Canadian Censuses. New evidence is provided on the performance of immigrant men and women in terms of three components of annual earnings: hourly wage rates, hours worked per week, and weeks worked per year. Evidence of intra-family trade-offs of investments in the immigrant husband's career at the expense of investments in the wife's career are not found overall. However, the wife's labour market performance is found to play a major role in the earnings creation of immigrant families. The findings support a family orientation to both the evaluation and the implementation of immigration policies.

 


Copyright 1992-2006 University of Toronto Press Incorporated except where otherwise noted. For guidelines on use of material on this site see Legal Notice. Every effort has been made to contact copyright holders of material included in this site. If your article appears here without your permission, please let us know and we will remove it. Contact Anne Marie Corrigan.